Dominion Lending CentresDLCG · #1 for new mortgages · $84.5B in 2025
Case Study

A Vacant Rental, a Refused Deferral and a Lender Headed to Court: A MIC Refinance Stopped the Foreclosure

A rental condo in Metro Vancouver sat empty for three months in 2023, the owner fell two months behind, and the lender granted one month's deferral, refused a second, sent the file to its lawyers and registered a certificate of pending litigation on title. We refinanced it with a mortgage investment corporation at 80% loan-to-value inside the lender's timeline, and the foreclosure stopped.

✓ Case Study · Residential / MIC
A Vacant Rental, a Refused Deferral and a Lender Headed to Court: A MIC Refinance Stopped the Foreclosure
ResidentialMICForeclosurePower of saleRefinanceRental

The Situation

The client owned a two-bedroom rental condo worth about $660,000 with an alternative lender's mortgage of roughly $512,000. In the summer of 2023 the tenant left and the unit stayed empty until October; at the same time the sub-tenant in the client's own rented home moved out. For three months the client was carrying personal rent, the empty basement's share and the condo's mortgage, about $7,750 a month in all, on one income.

The Challenge

The lender granted a one-month payment deferral, then declined to extend it and referred the file to its legal department. A certificate of pending litigation went on title, and the lender stopped accepting payments. By then the condo was tenanted again at $2,750 a month and the client's masonry business had signed contracts worth more than $12,000 a month, but a lender in foreclosure mode does not reopen the file, and a bank will not touch a mortgage with a CPL on it. The clock was running.

The Solution

We placed the file with a mortgage investment corporation on a one-year closed term, interest-only, at 80% loan-to-value: about $528,000, enough to pay out the existing lender in full, including the arrears and legal costs, and clear the CPL. The MIC underwrote the property, the rent and the new contracts rather than the credit history of the past year. The exit was set before closing: list the unit for sale during the term, with a refinance to an alternative lender as the second route.

The Outcome

The payout closed and the foreclosure ended. The client kept the condo, the tenant and the equity, roughly $130,000 that a court sale would have consumed in costs and a forced price, and bought a year to sell on their own terms. A MIC at a higher rate for twelve months cost far less than losing the property.

Have a file like this?

We fund complex mortgages across BC & Alberta. Send us the details and we'll tell you if we can help, honestly.

This anonymized case study describes one financing arranged by us, for general information only. It is not a commitment, approval or guarantee that another borrower will qualify for the same structure; terms depend on the borrower, security, lender policy and full underwriting. Names, exact figures, the lender and identifying details are withheld.